San Gimignano - SAN ROCCO 0-0: Positive or negative? 
NEGATIVE: How is zero to zero?
RESULT: It depends.
NEGATIVE: From what?
RESULT : Since so many things.
NEGATIVE: Like what?
RESULT: Well, how the match went, the level of your opponent, on the condition of your team, but especially in view of a regular-season depends on where your team has the first (and especially after) zero to zero.
N: Ah here's why you've waited a couple of days before writing the report cards. You wanted to see what they would do and USAP Fomenta?
E: honestly expect even Vico, Staggia, Padovani and Campiglia. I believe in the playoffs and it ends up that will also be very important position at the end of the championship. If you get 2 or 3 seems to be playing the quarter-final game at home ... you said nothing!
N: say? I will confirm it until the math does not continue to look back. It turns out that while you play the first 3 places, by dint of zero to zero t'inchiappettano good good and you end up rosicare the sixth step of the podium.
E: Apart from the fact that there is a podium with six steps! But then, you take over for being so pessimistic. You make me angry. We talk about the game away, you say? What is something you thought of this Sangimignano.
N: Caha I think has been done! The first twenty minutes I like living a nightmare, all around the field without art nor part, the three points that have both put Siena in the first minute crisis, Nencini was doing outside the third left hand was then moved to the right marker, Calebbo was often a meter below the line of markers rather than being two mere behind, but also government moved to save Pepi m'è in crisis seemed to mark Giannetti, I told you everything.
E: actually the first time was not much, especially in defense ...
N: WHAT? Especially in defense? But you saw that game sorry, we talk about the midfield? Panichi adapted midfielder I do not like, is one of the best players (in general) of the tournament and certainly my favorite defender in midfield but I lost the poem (The steak is bona, but if you eat soup for breakfast in the cappuccino is onconi. I do not know if it makes the idea), then did not take a fat ball. When they lack the space, and the opponents are the double of him, life is tough in the middle, especially if you are in equal numbers.
E: In midfield, we were a bit 'eh Pochini, we would have to consider. Two midfielders first band we played them there for an entire season, Pollina injured Caldini not at his best, Smith's return from holiday with thirty Margaritas advantage. Ciccio rose is limited ...
N: fact remains that it has put a ball on the ground and the sanrocco has literally eaten alive. In the second time something has changed with the arrival of Di Pasquale, but also to take him a red card in that way, I want to see if the end will give you enough.
E: And the three front? What do you say?
N: Edwards certainly did not tip, was to make the three-quartista but then the unexpected attitude of the guests almost forced him to take the winger. Often found in our area and in attack we have seen little. As for Ocean honestly hardly remember him. Balloons before they arrived we would miss a few but not enough to justify una prestazione da assente ingiustificato. Guarino invece bene, anzi benone. Tanta grinta, forza, determinazione, il ragazzo m’è piaciuto (a parte i capelli che non si posson vedere…)
E: Incredibile, un giudizio positivo…che è successo?
N: Senti fava, di giudizi positivi ce n’è un altro. Anche perché se tu avessi tenuto conto di tutti i giocatori che s’è nominato, invece di fare le battutine del cazzo ti saresti reso conto che non s’è parlato di Tambus Tamburello. E qui mi alzo in piedi, faccio un applauso e mi risiedo. Bravo! Bravo Tambus, l’unico abbondantemente sopra la sufficienza, l’unico ad attaccare e a difendere as they should, the only one to try to find the door though with little luck, it's about to be made.
The transcripts of Outcome and Negative: Mannucci 5 +: E: Negative , we has been done so far ... the "dumb". Has been said (or rather talked HAI) of all evil but he has not talked about us ...
N: Here we water. Let's face it if that's backpass Calebbo there passed between the legs had intercepted as they should, (had it not been for my step feline thanks to which I have removed an inch before the goal line is sarebbe fatto un figura mica da ridere!) e se tu avessi battuto almeno decentemente qualche rinvio da fondo campo; considerando la parata all’ultimo secondo ci saremmo meritati un 6, invece per me siamo da 4,5. Per te scommetto siamo da 6, facciamo una media e diamoci 5,25. Fattelo garbare.
E poi senti, da qui in poi le pagelle le fai te, io vo a cena. Almeno poi quardo il GF in piena digestione e fo du’ rutti più volentieri. Ah, l’ultima cosa. Qualsiasi voto deciderai, per chiunque, fai conto che io gli avrei dato mezzo voto meno. Minimo.
Pepi 6: Sulla carta avrebbe dovuto marcare Palermo ma dopo 30 secondi è chiaro che sarà Giannetti, schierato come prima punta, il suo uomo di riferimento. La partenza dell’intera retroguardia turrita è da brividi e anche CYBER finisce per risentirne. Molto meglio nel secondo tempo.
Bagni 5,5: La difesa adattata a tre marcatori con lui libero sembra metterlo in crisi nella prima frazione e Calebbo finisce per perdere le distanze e a chiamare la “salita” in momenti non troppo opportuni. Non è lucido come in altre occasioni e il retropassaggio suicida verso Mannucci può servire come testimonianza. Come tutta la difesa migliora nella seconda frazione nel corso della quale dimostra ben più intraprendenza e freddezza con un paio di chiusure delle sue.
Governa 6: Più calmo, preciso e tempestivo dei suoi compagni di reparto nei primi 40 minuti. The last 20 minutes of the race by passing them out loud in midfield in place of Tamburello but not as devastating as on other occasions.
Panichi 5: Deployed to make pair of midfield alongside Fats proves to be out of role, contrary to what happened, for example, in the game against the USAP. Hasty with the ball at his feet, does not affect the construction of the game and even during the ban and there are very few who managed to win balls in the head using his flying skills. When government goes back to midfield on its territory where he shows his true value.
Nencini 5: He should do the outside of a midfield four with little offensive but licenses After a few minutes vanish completely. A whole man marking the first time in highlighting the limits in defense "hard and pure." In the second half back on the band favors and productivity improves. A couple of attacks but little else.
Fat 4.5: Match to forget after the amazing performance of last Friday. Suffer physically the excessive power of the adversaries, not imposed reflecting the lack of space and lack of cooperation with panic and is essentially nil under interdiction. Bisignano replace it at half-time. Edwards
5.5: great spirit of sacrifice and determination in him to fill the role of external certainly not congenial. Log in in the field to make sure the three-quartista instead called repeatedly folding a tiring defense. Ineffective in attack throughout the first time he improves in the second half, when replaced in perhaps his finest hour.
Tamburello 7: I believe that Tambus excellent performance at half-time expresses in distress (eg strength, was the only one running), but for sixty minutes can be taken as an example to all comrades. All'USAP say it has never tried to pull, only he is trying at least four times ... two good saves excellent goalkeeper and a couple of conclusions in the second half to end the side. The spaces are on his side and he shows to do and "football sense." Leaves plenty of the match (sfinito!?!?) For about twenty minutes from the end.
Guarino 6.5: In the first half does what it can elbowing left and right and give the soul to carve out space and affect the match. Succeed is a difficult task because no balls playable even good intentions become ephemeral. In the second half goes more to maneuver to raise the team like a true striker with good movement, and controls the banks of the ball on the edge of jugglers.
Sea 4: Literally untouchable through the first time, runs empty and effort managing to get near the ball. For 40 minutes, as stated in the negative, this acts as AWOL, you can only see and hear in the dressing room just in words. Attitude to be reviewed in its entirety, it is in that field, especially outside.
Di Pasquale 3.5: Log between the first and the second time and maneuvering towers began to be more fluid and to follow a logical thread. The improved geometry although, considering its quality, there are still too many wrong steps. His performance, however, marred by a kick to an opponent's ball away and the resulting, clear and inevitable expulsion. Unjustifiable for an episode of his caliber. Often it is the character to make a difference. E 'was also the case Friday but not in the sense that all we wanted. We will see the extent of the ban and then we will understand if the effect of this expulsion will remain or not limited to the challenge with the San Rocco.
Bazzani 5.5: excellent on defense when he is the man attacked him. A bit 'when there is less space there is a need for clarity and precision. Error from beginner to wait for the bounce of the ball on a court opponent in more than one occasion he nearly puts a strain on the entire defense.
Rossi 6: Log in and you can see that the boy has the qualities, even if it is a bit 'too tanned and this sometimes does not go down well with opponents. Try setting but the most intriguing moment of his departure are those 5 minutes that never stops kicking his ankles to take the number five opponent, actually well below the minimum limit allowed antipaticità.
"puppet" Government 6.5; ten minutes for the last purchase of San Gimignano. The small "Hornet" to sell shows to have class, speed and bad racing. He moves well, puts a strain on the rear end goes to the host and calling the goalkeeper to save the match more difficult. (Those dell'USAP to have seen at least this shot ...?)
I finished, a embrace.
RESULT Not me: Leccatemelo.
NEGATIVE.
